Research oublished by Bob Cooper in Canada has shown that corporate project portfolios are becoming less innovative. One of the reasons is that systems like the Stage-Gate® product development process that emphasise heavy upfront planning put innovation in a straitjacket. They tend to favour low risk innovation outcomes.  Real innovation is complex and requires flexibility to accommodate shifting customer and market expectations. To drive innovation, product development processes must be flexible enough to deal with changes as close to market launch as possible. This cannot  easily be accommodated with traditional stage gate processes where designs are frozen at the front end and conventional wisdom suggests that unacceptable costs occur if changes are made later in the development process.

Agile product development processes on the other hand are designed to build flexibility into the development process by creating and enhancing development options, delaying decisions and in general reducing the cost of change. Agile processes balance the pay-off between the cost of change and profitability from more innovative products and services. Over the last 10 years adoption of agile methods has revolutionised the software development industry and led to a huge improvement in project success and customer satisfaction.  There is now an opportunity to use these same approaches to drive innovation in conventional (ie physical) products and service.

Scrum is an agile management framework, based on lean principles, within which complex products and services can be developed. Scrum emphases cross-functional teamwork and is a metaphor for the game of rugby in which the team packs together to move the ball forward. In Scrum, work is structured in cycles of work called sprints, iterations of work that are typically two to four weeks in duration. During each sprint, teams pull from a prioritised list of customer requirements, so that the features that are developed first are of the highest value to the customer. At the end of each sprint, an increment of customer value is delivered.  The process is highly flexible because at the end of each sprint the customer has the opportunity to review the product so that it can be adapted as requirements evolve.

Although Agile methods and Scrum has been used extensively in the software development industry for over 10 years, application of these approaches to traditional new product development has only recently received attention. The Stage-Gate® Process is the predominant management approach used in this sector over the last 20 years. The adoption of agile product development methods and Scrum in particular to traditional new product development is a new and emerging area. It has the potential to revolutionise the management of new product development and the delivery of innovative solutions to customers.  It has the potential to be the next “big thing” in new product development management thinking

Last Updated (Friday, 04 June 2010 10:20)

 

You can't open a newspaper, watch the news or listen to radio news without hearing about the political wrangling over the Federal Government's carbon trading scheme (called the Carbon Reduction Scheme - CPRS). Despite all the lobbying from the big end of town, business needs certainty, it needs the CPRS legislation to be passed soon so that it can work out how a market price for carbon will affect their businesses.

I have just read an excellent book** published by Harvard Business Press that puts current climate confusion into perspective. The authors argue that like it or not business needs to accept that climate change has moved beyond a public debate. Business needs to think about climate change as a market transition in which controls on carbon pollution will affect the price of energy, products and services. All sectors of the economy will be affected as the price of carbon ripples through the economy right down to your business' bottom line.

We are facing a future carbon constrained world which will drive the biggest market transition in living memory. There will be winners and losers, some industry sectors will be impacted more than others. The authors argue that you must separate your business acumen from your feelings about climate change, whether you believe it or not. You must face up to this market transition by understanding the risks but more importantly seeing the business opportunities that it will throw up. You must take action now and start preparing for the market shift that a price signal for carbon will create. You need a strategy to help you navigate your way through the turbulance and opportunites ahead.

Using the insights from reading the Harvard publication, I have come up with a practical process you can use to develop a carbon strategy for your business. The carbon strategy must form an intergral part of your overall business strategy. Think of it like your marketing or OH&S strategies, critical elements that must be managed to drive your business. The steps are:

  1. Measure your carbon footprint - you can't improve what you can't measure 
  2. Determine your carbon risk and liability. This comes out of the carbon footprint analysis and will show you whether you have liabilities to report emissions to the Government or get caught up under the CPRS. It will help you work out whether you are exposed to supply chain of customer risks. 
  3. Develop a carbon reduction plan. Develop a plan to reduce emissions by developing low carbon products and services and driving waste and inefficiency out of your business. The good news is that these activities will also save you money.
Simple in theory, but hard to do I hear you say! It's worth the effort however. Work done by McKinsey has shown that most businesses could reduce their carbon emissions by 20 - 30% at minimal or not cost. In fact many of these initiatives will save money!

In future posts, I will discuss how you can work your way through the 3 steps in developing your carbon strategy.

Michael du Plessis

www.greenice.com.au


**For further reading see "Climate Change. What's Your Business Strategy?" by Andrew J. Hoffman and John G. Woody, Harvard Business Press.

Last Updated (Tuesday, 23 June 2009 17:11)